Bold Thinking or Complete Nonsense?
Posted by ~Ray @ 2008-09-28 02:15:04
Robert Shiller is proposing it's. Shiller's article starts out with the idea that housing prices may decline 30% or more just as they did from 1925-1933. On that I agree. After some history about what happened under FDR. Shiller completely dove off the deep end with proposals to "fix" the problem. For example please consider:
In light of modern financial theory this would also be a good time to think about the nature of the implicit subsidies given to government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and whether they provide enough incentives for them to properly manage their own risks as guarantors of mortgages. We should think about whether the F. H. A should be encouraged to take on a bigger role that might compete with activities of the subprime lenders that have grown so rapidly over the last decade. We might create a new consumer-oriented regulatory authority like the Financial Products Safety Commission that Elizabeth Warren a professor at Harvard Law School has been advocating. It would monitor financial products for consumers and draft regulations to prevent practices like the recent widespread issuance of adjustable-rate mortgages to low-income borrowers who couldn’t afford the rate resets.
Beyond that we should think creatively about how to use vastly improved tools for risk management and apply them to mortgages. For example. I and my colleague Allan Weiss (now C. E. O of Index Capital Advisors) proposed in 1994 to make home equity insurance — insurance on the market value of a home — part of a home owe contract. Had our proposal been put into place on a large scale it would have gone a long way toward ameliorating the current crisis and reducing the need for personal bankruptcies.
All the immediately preceding proposal does is shift risk from one entity to another. On the surface homeowners would be protected but who is protecting the insurance company?One good look at the complete collapse of Ambac (ABK) and MBIA (MBI) should be enough to bring out the problem: Insurance is only good if the insurer can pay out. In this case anyone insuring the value of houses would have desire ago failed putting the burden right approve on the homeowner. That is the seen. The unseen is belief that such a scheme could possibly work would likely undergo led to an even bigger bubble than we saw. Root Causes Of The Housing Bubble
1) The Creation of GSEsDoes anyone change surface remember the mission of the GSEs. It is to back up "affordable housing". Now there are proposals in Congress and supported by Bernanke to allow Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) to make loans up to $1,000,000. Is this affordable housing or complete insanity?
2) Government sponsorship of the ownership societyGovernment sponsorship and promotion of housing including some 300 odd programs to make "housing affordable" undergo had the opposite effect. Government has no business promoting housing over renting or making people feel like back up class citizens for not owning a domiciliate.
3) The Greenspan Fed slashing arouse rates to 1%Banks mistakenly assumed the difference between the rate at which they borrowed and lent would cover problems. In addition banks have repeatedly learnedthat the Fed would bail out their mistakes. This led to extreme reckless lending including Citigroup (C) CEO Chuck Prince dancing like a fool in pass of 2007 right as everything was starting to collapse.
Root Cause Of The Great DepressionLike Bernanke. Shiller seems to have no idea of what caused the great depression. The Cause was an expansion of money and credit leading up to the collapse. Nowhere in Shiller's proposals does he address the cause of the housing bubble or the cause of the depression. The four points above are really sub-bullets to the greater thesis: Reckless expansion of money and credit eventually leads to collapses. I am extremely disappointed in the socialist nonsense proposed by Shiller. Instead of addressing the root causes. Shiller wants to try the same failed ideas of still greater government intervention into remove markets. Nonetheless I agree with Shiller on one key idea: It's Time for Bold Thinking. For those who want to try something really different and something that ordain actually work. I declare.... Bold New Thinking
The Best Way to Buy Gold and SilverDisclaimer:The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content including advertisements shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a position in any company or advertiser referenced above. Any action that you take as a result of information analysis or advertisement on this site is ultimately your responsibility. ask your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.
Comment Guidelines: Comments should be succinct constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging diverse and meaningful commentary. Comments that include personal attacks racial religious or ethnic slurs are not permitted. We continuously review and remove any inappropriate comments.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/11/bold-thinking-or-complete-nonsense.html
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
