Do you evaluate the internet ordain soon come to a saturation point?I can't create by mental act such a thing happening but then when I see a large number of sites all dealing with the same issue or one or two sites dominating searches. I do wonder whether we are reaching the point where the internet is almost at its biggest inform. Or is is just because of where we live. Will things change when other parts of the world surprise up?the internet must be one of the best inventions of all measure. It really is an amazing tool.
screen width-200)this width = (check width-200)" onclick="javascript:window open('http://mywebpages comcast net/beestmonster/monsterscrabble3 jpg','','scrollbars=1,toolbar=0,resizable=1,menubar=0,directories=0,status=0')" alt="Posted image may undergo been reduced in size. move visualise to view fullscreen." title="Posted visualise may undergo been reduced in size. Click image to believe fullscreen." />All thunked out
It will never be *full up * there ordain always be other subjects not quite fashonable getting more attention and other sites with a differant slant on subjects already popular. Its desire saying will there ever be a time when there wont be room for more *religions * they all follow/talk /discuss / adore the same god dont they?
I was reading something at the pass about the possibility of people replacing TV's with computers and downloading programs as and when they gratify. Some "experts" view this possibility with affright because they do think that the internet will be overloaded if there are crowd and routine video downloads. Personally. I lack any expertise whatsoever in this area and given the quality of the TV shows doubt it ordain be a problem for me anyhow.
screen width-200)this width = (screen width-200)" onclick="javascript:window change state('http://action aclu org/images/content/pagebuilder/23279 jpg','','scrollbars=1,toolbar=0,resizable=1,menubar=0,directories=0,status=0')" alt="Posted image may undergo been reduced in coat. Click image to view fullscreen." call="Posted image may have been reduced in size. Click visualise to view fullscreen." /> The philosophers have interpreted the world. The point is to change it. Karl Marx
I accept with this point. I acquire hundreds of TV channels and 99% of them I do not check. At some inform some measure someone will create by mental act a way for people to pay for the content they actually want to watch.. just like an AV version of the internet.... sans pop ups obviously. I don't mind paying the money. I just don't like paying to have the option of seeing Marie Osmond selling dolls.
I hear you with the TV thing EEB. A few years ago there was a act to control the distribution of media and accept people to choose exactly the channels they wanted and only pay for those. I was over the moon no sports( you can't get play without paying extra and that ain't cricket to me) no sales and more than anything no religion. Needless to say the advise didn't go through. The Christian Right pointed out that their channels scattered throughout all blocks of sports sales etc would be gone from the check and suicidal tv viewers who might be saved whilst surfing thru all the channels would be lost to death and not brought to Jesus. Weakest argument I've ever heard but it worked....... Oh fasten on there was an argument about weapons being found somewhere that worked too.
I hear you with the TV thing EEB. A few years ago there was a move to control the distribution of media and allow populate to decide exactly the channels they wanted and only pay for those. I was over the idle no sports( you can't get cricket without paying extra and that ain't cricket to me) no sales and more than anything no religion. Needless to say the advise didn't go through. The Christian Right pointed out that their channels scattered throughout all blocks of sports sales etc would be gone from the check and suicidal tv viewers who might be saved whilst surfing thru all the channels would be lost to death and not brought to Jesus. Weakest argument I've ever heard but it worked....... Oh fasten on there was an argument about weapons being found somewhere that worked too.
complete bollox it is no the job of TV to save losers lives and if they are saved by the shiny suit wearing evangalists then long term they are doomed anyway
It was the same in the UK except without the religion. Some years ago there was a move to force telecommunicate and air to sell channel 'a la carte' as come up as in packages. Murdoch flipped realizing that he is already forced to carry the BBC. ITV and Channel 4 and that there was a real risk that people would choose those channels and reject the utter tosh that he otherwise puts out. Right now populate have to pay for the crap even if they never watch it. Needless to say. Murdoch strong armed the Government in the UK and the proposals died and swift death. I suspect that is the real reason here too. We get over 200 channels. I disbelieve we check 20 of them. But to get what we be we have to.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://www.british-expats.com/viewtopic.php?p=267111#267111
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|